Glossary›Emissions accounting and measurement›NGA Factors (National Greenhouse Accounts)

Glossary term

Cluster D · D13

Tier 1 · differentiator

NGA Factors (National Greenhouse Accounts)

Definition

The National Greenhouse Accounts Factors are the Australian Government’s published emission factors for fuels, electricity by state and territory, waste and other common activities, updated annually by the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water. They are the default factor set for Australian corporate emissions estimates. They must not be used to meet reporting obligations under the NGER Act.

DCCEEW

· National Greenhouse Accounts Factors, annual edition · published guidance, not a legislative instrument

In practice

This is the most-used document in Australian carbon accounting and the one most frequently used wrongly, in a specific and consequential way.

The standing caution. The NGA Factors are for estimating emissions for purposes other than NGER reporting. DCCEEW states the position directly: the factors must not be used to meet reporting requirements under the National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting Act 2007. An entity registered under NGER calculates its NGER emissions using the NGER Measurement Determination, not the NGA Factors document. The two are related (the NGA Factors draw on the Measurement Determination) but they are not interchangeable, and the difference bites in two directions.

Your position

What the NGA Factors are for you

An NGER reporter

Your NGER submission must be on the NGER basis. Using NGA Factors for that return is non-compliant.

An NGER reporter also preparing an AASB S2 disclosure

You now have two figures that can legitimately differ, and you need to decide which basis your statutory climate disclosure runs on and say so. AASB S2 permits a method other than the GHG Protocol where a jurisdictional authority requires one, and the NGER Measurement Determination is that other method. Two Australian entities of the same size can report on different bases and both be compliant. What is not defensible is running two bases inside one entity and not disclosing which produced the disclosed figure.

Not an NGER reporter

The NGA Factors are the right default and there is no serious competing Australian factor set for Scope 1 and Scope 2.

The structure worth knowing. The document separates factors by scope, so the same fuel appears with a Scope 1 combustion factor and a Scope 3 extraction-and-transport factor. Electricity carries a state-and-territory Scope 2 factor and a separate Scope 3 factor covering transmission and distribution losses and upstream fuel extraction. Reporters who take only the Scope 2 figure and omit the Scope 3 electricity line have a Category 3 gap that is trivially visible.

The update cycle. A new edition publishes annually, and state electricity factors move meaningfully year to year as grids decarbonise. That has a consequence people miss: a business whose consumption is flat will report falling Scope 2 purely because the grid factor fell. That is a real change in emissions and it is correctly reported, but it is not a result of anything the business did, and a board paper that presents it as performance is misleading its own directors.

What the assurer does with it

The assurer’s first question is which edition, and their second is whether one edition was applied consistently across the whole period and the whole inventory. A model built over several months frequently picks up two editions because whoever built the later sheets downloaded the current version.

They then look up a sample of factors in the cited edition and re-perform the calculation. This is a direct documentary test with a binary outcome.

They accept the NGA Factors of a stated edition, applied by state where the factor is state-specific, applied consistently across the period, and cited in the basis of preparation. They reject a mixed-edition model, a national average factor applied to a business with concentrated state exposure, and (the one that catches NGER reporters) NGA Factors used to produce a figure that is also being presented as an NGER-basis number.

Where the entity is an NGER reporter, the assurer will ask for the NGER submission and reconcile it to the disclosed figures. Differences are expected and are not findings in themselves. An unexplained difference, or a basis of preparation that does not disclose which method was used, is a finding.

Commonly confused with

The NGER Measurement Determination, which is the legislative instrument governing NGER reporting and is the thing an NGER reporter must actually apply. Also confused with the National Greenhouse Gas Inventory, which is Australia’s national-level emissions account and is a different document with a different purpose.

Timing and relief

A new edition publishes each year. The edition current at the time an inventory is built is the one to use, and it should be named in the basis of preparation with its year. Set a calendar reminder rather than a habit: a factor set applied by muscle memory is how a superseded edition survives into a current report.

Sources

1

National Greenhouse Accounts Factors

DCCEEW

2

National Greenhouse Accounts Factors: 2025

DCCEEW

3

AASB S2 Climate-related Disclosures, compiled to December 2025

AASB

4

National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting Act 2007 (Cth), sections 11 and 11A

Federal Register of Legislation

Review status

Review required

Last reviewed

15 September 2026

Editorial pass, unsigned

Reviewer required

Carbon accounting specialist

Next scheduled review

1 August 2027

next expected National Greenhouse Accounts Factors release

Part of

Cluster D, Emissions accounting and measurement

49 terms from the head term carbon accounting down to individual Scope 3 categories and the mechanics of factors, boundaries and data quality. The largest cluster in the glossary.

Where this sits commercially

Carbonhalo names the factor edition in the basis of preparation and applies one edition across the whole period, which is the finding most first-year models fail on.

Other terms in this cluster