Glossary term

Cluster D · D32

Tier 1

Value chain

Definition

A value chain is the full set of activities that bring a product or service into existence and carry it through to end of life, from raw material extraction to disposal. In greenhouse gas accounting it defines the population of indirect emissions an organisation must consider, upstream from its suppliers and downstream through its customers.

GHG Protocol Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Standard (2011)

· chapter 5 ·

In force

In practice

The term does real work because it is the population definition for Scope 3. Everything in the value chain is a candidate for measurement; nothing outside it is. An entity that cannot describe its value chain cannot demonstrate that its Scope 3 screening was complete, which is the assertion most likely to fail in a first-year engagement.

The description that survives scrutiny is concrete and specific to the business. Not “our suppliers and customers”, but the tiers: what the entity buys, from roughly whom, in what volume; what it does to it; who it sells to; what happens to the product afterwards. For a private Australian business the upstream half is usually reconstructable from the accounts payable ledger, because the creditors listing is a near-complete map of purchased goods and services by spend. The downstream half rarely is, and that is where the work sits.

Value chain is not the same as legal control, and the distinction is the source of the most common objection. Entities argue they cannot report emissions they do not control. Scope 3 does not turn on control; it turns on the activity being in the value chain. Influence, not control, is the organising idea.

What the assurer does with it

The assurer asks for a documented value chain map and tests it against the entity’s own commercial records. The standard cross-check is the creditors listing by spend: they take the top suppliers by value and confirm each is reflected somewhere in the Scope 3 screening. A supplier in the top twenty by spend that appears nowhere in the screening is a direct completeness finding.

Downstream, they test against the revenue side (the customer or channel analysis, the product listing) and ask what happens to the product after sale. They accept a map derived from the entity’s own financial records with a stated method for how it was built. They reject a generic industry value chain diagram with no link to the entity’s actual suppliers or customers, and a map that stops at tier 1 for a business whose material emissions sit further up.

Commonly confused with

Supply chain, which covers the upstream half only and excludes everything after the sale. Where a business model is downstream-dominant, using the two terms interchangeably systematically understates Scope 3.

Sources

1

Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Accounting and Reporting Standard, full text

GHG Protocol

2

AASB S2 Climate-related Disclosures, compiled to December 2025

AASB

Review status

Review required

Last reviewed

15 September 2026

Editorial pass, unsigned

Reviewer required

Carbon accounting specialist

Next scheduled review

1 July 2027

Part of

Cluster D, Emissions accounting and measurement

49 terms from the head term carbon accounting down to individual Scope 3 categories and the mechanics of factors, boundaries and data quality. The largest cluster in the glossary.

Other terms in this cluster